Equipment Improvement Selection

A Business problem that we are currently experiencing is that we must(prenominal) p.a. as groups perform an ?Equipment approach Project?. The purpose of these teams is twofold. The premier purpose of the Equipment expediency Project is to refresher fostering to build Total Process Reliability philosophies, techniques and practices. The second purpose of the Equipment advancement Project is to follow prescribed serve in reversive the equipment to like new condition and maintaining it in that manner. No government issue which composing of equipment is giveed, we are able to accomplish the conceptual tuition portion of our Projects. However, the second portion of our projects do non unendingly mate their desired intent if the equipment studyed is something that is easy to do quite than the piece of equipment that would jibe the just about apprize back to our knead if returned to a like new state. An example of this is the choice of equipment that is non criti cal to the regale and a new unit could be purchased for less than what it costs to put up it to like new condition. Additionally, we disport from experience lay out that selecting the best vista purifyd guileless within the group of personnel that operate and maintain the equipment, as well as, improved dependableness and cling to added to the exhibit. The need to improve the choice process drove us come up with a pickaxe process to invest the best Equipment benefit Project Candidate. The first thing change that took place was to correspond works people input into the plectron process. Typically, charge would select the prognosiss without input form operations and maintenance personnel. Personnel would wherefore bring their list of candidates to the process team for review apply criteria that would identify the best candidate. The next step was to follow a triage process similar to many risk management processes. We strand that by assigning a figure assoc iated to the four categories of asylum, env! ironmental, foster and resources that we expected to card. It was in truth easy to select the best candidate. later on implementing the use of this selection method, we stool had many successful projects that give up brought our operations personnel to buy-in to the process, as well as, increase equipment dependableness and environmental regulation compliance related to equipment breakdowns. Figure 1The office by side(p) questionnaire (figure 2) was created, and the data gathered used to measure the execution and identify areas for improvements. Figure 2Equipment utility Team Equipment Selection Questionnaire1.Does the triage of equipment add rate to the selection of equipment for improvement?a.Yesb.No2.Was the triage selection process conk out than selecting equipment without a triage process?a.Yesb.No3.Do you belief more candidate equipment where occupyed than in the bygone?a.More Than beforeb.About the samec.Less than before4.Do you feel that safety concerns shou ld be a primal favor when selecting equipment?a.Yesb.No5.Do you feel that environmental concerns should be a subsidiary friendship in selection of equipment?a.Yesb.No6.Do you feel that improvements, which impart majuscule improvements in overall operating costs, should be considered before safety or environmental concerns?a.Yesb.No7.If you were to reorganize the priority of our triage, what priority would you consider for the side by side(p)? Assign a number of 1-4 from highest to lowesta.Safety __________b.Environmental __________c.Value __________d.Resources __________Figure 3 (cont.)8.Which of the following factors were just about influential in your decision to provide a candidate for consideration?a.Personal preferenceb.Economic benefitsc.Equipment dependability benefits to the process teamd.Compliance with regulatory agency requirements9.Do you feel that management will support your team?s equipment selection?a.Yesb.No10.

After initial Equipment selection process changes have uncovered what you suppose is a better candidate would you be more or less likely to bring this to the attention of your team and management?a.More Than beforeb.About the samec.Less than beforeAnalysis of the survey provided some very interesting information. The biggest discovery was that most of the operations people matte up that they where not consulted in the selection of equipment for improvements previous to the triage selection process. Secondly, most of felt that equipment improvement efforts did not have much value since the best candidates where not perpetually selected. Other points of interest where i dentify through measures implemented on equipment reliability after selection process included: misbegotten time between misery (MTBF), Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE), the number of defects and counter measures completed on time and follow-up audits results. The great improvement and probably the hardest to measure the intangible reward that the operation personnel received when pieces of process equipment within their sphere where passably selected and improvements made. We have seen a prominent increase in willpower and pride concerning process equipment reliability within our operations personnelReferencesTPM: An a lot Misunderstood Equipment Improvement Strategy MaintenanceTechnology (2004, March), Retrieved on February 10, 2005 from the WorldWide clear: http://www.mt-online.com/articles/04-00tpm2.cfmHow to Address Selection, polish Opportunities (2005, January), Retrieved onFebruary 10, 2005 from the World Wide nett:http://www.gradlink.edu.au/content/view/ ampl e/131Continuous Improvement, Sustainable free energy! (2005, January), Retrieved onFebruary 10, 2005 from the World Wide meshwork: http://www.seav.vic.gov.au/advice/business/energy_management/continuous_improvement.asp If you want to get a full essay, collection it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay