South Korea: A Poorly Developed National Innovation System and a Leading Role in the Semiconductor Industry

A. to the south KOREA?S NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEM (NIS)1I.stinting OVERVIEW11.Economic outgrowth history12.Major scotch indicators2II.SOUTH KOREA?S CATCH-UP INNOVATION MODEL21.Chaebol42.Government53.University7III.MAJOR WEAKNESSES OF SOUTH KOREA?S NIS81.Limitation of catch-up model92.Deficit engineering difference of payment93.Inefficient form _or_ system of government formulation104.Chaebols? roles to be reconsidered105.Heavy credence on hostile supplies106.Imbalanced stringency of R& antiophthalmic positionor;D resources and outputs117.Poor interactions among GRIs, universities and private sector118.Shortage of basic research139.Inadequacy and grim quality of R&D manpower14IV.FUTURE VISION OF SOUTH KOREA?S NIS15B.SOUTH KOREA?S semiconductor INDUSTRY16I.OVERVIEW OF ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY16II.SOUTH KOREA?S SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY IN INTERACTION WITH DRIVING FORCES171.From 1965 to 1983182.From 1983 to now19III.CASE meditate OF SOME SOUTH KOREA?S SEMI CONDUCTOR COMPANIES21C.CONCLUSION24BIBLIOGRAPHY25. A. SOUTH KOREA?S NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMI. ECONOMIC OVERVIEW1. Economic Development HistorySouth Korea?s innovation advancement is for certain an integral part of its history, particularly the post-war time. Science and engineering policies varied in each stage, existence both the reason and egress for economic performance and priorities.

consort to World Bank?s study in 1993, Korean development history is separate into 5 chief(prenominal) periods:? War, reconstruction and land reform (1950-60)? Export burlesque (1961-73)? Heavy and chemical industri es drive (1973-79)? Functional incentives a! nd relaxation way (1980-90)? Financial sector liberalization (1990-now)Export dupery periodThe export takeoff period was characterized by the rapacious promotion of exports combined with classic import protection at home by employ trade, foreign exchange and monetary policies. The trade regime was dyed in favor of exports. Technology was mostly acquired from abroad. Despite the fact that FDI policy in this period was rather free, foreign investment in South Korea remained very(prenominal) low due to uncertainties about the kingdom?s policy-making and economic outlook. Therefore, FDI did not act as a main channel for technology transfer. This mission be in policies of foreign licensing, giving priority to technology that promoted exports, certain intermediate products for big(p) goods industries or brought diffusion effect to other sectors. The constraining policy on licensing strengthened local... If you want to get a honorabl e essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay